No power in the blood?
Russell D. Moore writes in the March issue of Touchstone that "American Christianity is far les blody than it used to be. Songs like 'Power in the Blood' or 'There is a Fountain Filed with Blood' or 'Are you Washed in the Blood' are still sung in some places but fewer and fewer, and there aren't many newer songs or priase choruses focsed on blood. The cross yes; redemption, yes; but blood rarely."
Moore says, "What could be more repulsive, even sickening, to a clean, antiseptic society than talk of spattered blood?"
Does the lack of blood in choruses or hymns chosen indicate a less robust Christianty or is the gospel-in-song being contextualized in different ways? If the blood makes you clean then that's what an antiseptic society needs.
Moore says, "What could be more repulsive, even sickening, to a clean, antiseptic society than talk of spattered blood?"
Does the lack of blood in choruses or hymns chosen indicate a less robust Christianty or is the gospel-in-song being contextualized in different ways? If the blood makes you clean then that's what an antiseptic society needs.